EVENING SPIRITUAL DIARY FOR 4/11/2025 7:11 PM
JOHN MACARTHUR’S INTRO TO 2 JOHN
I mentioned in my last SD that I would quote the
introduction on 2 John by John MacArthur, as I used Warren Wiersbe’s
introduction in yesterday’s SD. I think
that it is good to get the prospective from both of these men of God.
Occasion And Purpose
“The two brief epistles of 2 and 3 John are the shortest
New Testament books. Each contains fewer
than 300 words in the Greek text and could have fit on a single papyrus sheet
(cf. 2 John 12:3 John 13). They closely
approximate the conventional letter form of the contemporary Greco-Roman world.
“But despite their brevity, both epistles are significant
in that they stress the importance and boundaries of loving in the truth. Second John addresses the same basic
historical events as 1 John: false teachers were assaulting the congregations
under John’s care (v. 7). Having left
the fellowship of believers (1 John 2:19), the heretics were traveling from
church to church, taking advantage of Christian hospitality as they spread
their venomous lies. The lady to whom
John addressed this letter may have inadvertently or unwisely show them
hospitality. John cautioned her (as a
model for all believers) against participating in false teachers’ evil deeds by
showing them hospitality.
AUTHOR, DATE AND PLACE OF WRITING
“This letter’s close affinities with 1 John (e. g. , v. 5
and 1 John 2:7; 3:11; v. 6 and 1 John 5:3; v. 7 and 1 John 2:18-26; v. 9 and 1
John 2:23; v. 12 and 1 John 1:4) make it clear that it also was written by John
the apostle…Second John was most likely composed at Ephesus at about the same
time or shortly after 1 John (c. A. D. 90-95).
DESTINATION AND READERS
“Many commentators believe the phrase ‘the chosen lady’
(v. 1) refers metaphorically to a local church.
The more natural understanding in the context, however, is to take it as
a reference to an actual woman and her children, whom John knew
personally. The letter’s obvious
similarity to 3 John, which clearly (v. 1) was written to an individual, favors
the view that 2 John also was written to an individual. Further, it would be unnatural to sustain
such a figure of speech throughout the whole letter. Such an elaborate metaphor is also not in
keeping with the letter’s simplicity and tenderness of its tone. Finally, the change from the singular form of
the personal pronoun ‘you’ in v. 5 to the plural form in v. 12 applies more naturally
to a woman and her children than to a church and its members.
OUTLINE
I.
The Basis of
Christian Hospitality (1-3)
II.
The Behavior of
Christian Hospitality (4-6)
III.
The Bounds of
Christian Hospitality (7-11)
IV.
The Blessings
of Christian Hospitality (12-13)
We
now have both short introductions to this second letter written by John, and it
seems like both of them refer to the lady as an actual lady, which is something
that in my short study of 2 John from a long time ago kind of disagrees with
what I first was taught and that is John was referring to a church. I think that my mind has been changed and
John was actually writing to a real woman (lady) who perhaps housed a church in
her house as Dr. Wiersbe mentioned. At
any rate, Lord willing, I will begin to look at 2 John in my next SD.
4/11/2025 7:37 PM
No comments:
Post a Comment