EVENING SPIRITUAL DIARY FOR 6/29/2025 7:55 PM
Focus: PT-5 “Introduction to Jude”
“Occasion”
It is my desire to finish this introduction by John
MacArthur this evening, as there are two more sub-points that we have to look
at this evening.
“Jude had originally planned to write a positive letter,
celebrating the great truths of the ‘common salvation’ that he shared with his
readers (v. 3). But the alarming news
that false teachers had invaded the congregations to which he wrote,
threatening that salvation truth (v. 4), compelled him to change his
plans. Thus he wrote a strong
denunciation of the false teachers and their godless lifestyle—warning his
readers and calling them to ‘contend earnestly for the faith’ so as to protect
the one common gospel (v. 3). The
magnificent doxology with which the letter concludes (vv. 24-25) reveals Jude’s
confidence that his readers would stand firm by God’s grace.
“The exact identity of the false teachers is
unknown. That they were not
second-century Gnostics is clear, since there is no evidence of the distinctive
teachings of Gnosticism (such as a cosmological dualism with the transcendent
good God opposed to the evil emanation who created the material world; the evil
of the material world; salvation through a secret or hidden knowledge, etc.) in
Jude’s description of them.
“In fact, Jude did not focus on the nuances of their
false doctrine. Instead he denounced
their godless lifestyle—condemning them as ‘ungodly’ a total of six times (vv.
4, 15, 18). That alone marked them as
false teachers, since as Jesus said, ‘You will know them by their fruits’
(Matt. 7:16, 20). Having exposed their
corrupt lives, there was no need for Jude to refute their specific heretical
teachings, since ‘by revealing their character Jude stripped them of any
authority in the congregation. No thinking Christian would follow people who
are fundamentally selfish. Jude did not merely
revile them. He unveiled who they truly
were, removing any grounds for their influence in the church’ (Schreiner, 1, 2 Peter, Jude, 415).
“The picture Jude paints of the false teachers reveals the shocking depths of their depravity. Like stealthy beasts of prey, they ‘crept in unnoticed’ (v. 4) among God’s people. They perverted ‘the grace of our God into licentiousness’ (v. 4), turning the very grace that instructs believers ‘to deny ungodliness and worldly desires and to live sensibly, righteously and godly’ lives (Titus 2:11-12) into a license to sin. They were so corrupt that Jude compared them to such notorious sinners as the fallen angels, the men of Sodom and Gomorrah, Cain, Balaam, and the rebels under Korah (vv. 6, 7, 11). Put simply, they were like ‘unreasoning animals’ (v. 10). In their brazen audacity, they ‘reject[ed] authority, and revile [d] angelic majesties’ (v. 8)—something even the powerful archangel Michael did not do (v. 9). Because of their arrogant pride ‘these men revile[d] the things which they [did] not understand’ (v. 10).
“Jude described their deceitful hypocrisy using
vivid metaphors:
These are the men who are hidden reefs in your love feasts when they feast with you without fear, caring for themselves; clouds without water, carried along by winds; autumn trees without fruit, doubly dead, uprooted; wild waves of the sea, casting up their own shame like foam; wandering stars, for whom the black darkness has been reserved forever. (vv.12-13)
In short, although they
were in the church, they were not part of it; they were ‘devoid of the Spirit
(v. 19) and hence unredeemed (Rom. 8:9).
The reality of their wicked hypocrisy and the consequent danger they
posed for the church summoned Jude’s strongest possible condemnation and
warning.”
THE RELATIONSHIP OF JUDE TO 2 PETER
“Even a cursory reading of Jude and 2 Peter reveals the
striking parallels between them. In
fact, nineteen of Jude’s twenty-five verses find parallels in 2 Peter. Scholars are divided about which author used
the other as a source. (There is a third possibility that both Peter and Jude
drew from a common source. However,
there is no evidence that such a source existed.) Many of the arguments for the priority of
either epistle are subjective and tend to cancel each other out. There are two objective arguments, however,
that favor the chronological priority of 2 Peter. First, Peter predicts that the false teachers
will come in the future (e.g., 2:1, 2; 16).
That strongly implies that 2 Peter was written before Jude. That Peter refers a few times to the false
teachers using the present tense does not nullify the force of that argument,
since ‘the present tense is used consistently [by Peter] to describe the character of the false teachers, while
the future tense is used to describe their coming’
[Biblical Studies Press: www.bible.org,
2000], emphasis in original). If Peter
was familiar with Jude’s epistle, which describes the false teachers as already
present in the church, his use of the future tense would not make sense.
“Second, the wording of verses 17-18 is almost identical
to 2 Peter 3:3. It appears that Jude is
citing Peter’s prophecy (that false teachers would come) and noting its
fulfillment in his day. There is no
other similarly-worded prophecy in Scripture to which Jude could be
referring. Further, the word translated ‘mockers’
(empiktes) appears in the New
Testament only in Jude 18 and 2 Peter 3:3.
Jude used the plural ‘apostles’ in verse 17, even though he quoted only
Peter, because the other apostles had made similar predictions (cf. 1 Tim. 4:1;
2 Tim. 3:1-5; 4:3).
OUTLINE
The
Salutation (1-2)
I.
The Danger of
Apostates (3-4)
II.
The doom of
Apostates (5-7
III.
The Description
of Apostates (8-16)
IV.
The Defense
Against Apostates (17-23)
The Concluding Doxology (24-25)
That
is the end of John MacArthur’s introduction to Jude’s epistle and it is my
prayer that all who read it will be helped as we go through this rather short
epistle, but will have many pages in my Spiritual Diaries to write about this
wonderful little letter. 6/29/2025 8:44
PM
No comments:
Post a Comment