Saturday, September 2, 2023

"The Approach of the Pharisees" (Matt. 22:34-35)

 

SPIRITUAL DIARY FOR 9/2/2023 9:54 AM

 

My Worship Time                                                           Focus:  “The Approach of the Pharisees”

 

Bible Reading & Meditation                                              Reference:  Matthew 22:34-35

 

            Message of the verses:  34 But when the Pharisees heard that He had put the Sadducees to silence, they gathered themselves together. 35 And one of them, a lawyer, asked Him a question, testing Him,”

 

            I mentioned in our last SD that this will be the final question that Jesus is asked as the Jewish leaders will give up trying to test Him, so they will plan another way to have Him killed.

 

            Here is a review of the first and second tests given to Jesus.  The Pharisees used the Herodians to give Him a political test about the poll-tax.  The second test, by the Sadducees was a theological test and it pertained to the reality of the resurrection, something they denied.  Now the Pharisees are about to give Jesus a test in the area of theology.

 

            MacArthur writes “When Jesus answered the absurd question about the seven brothers by showing that even Moses taught the resurrection, He had put the Sadducees to silence.  The verb Phimoo (put…to silence) literally means to muzzle, to forcefully restrict the opening of the mouth.  The term is used of the muzzling of an ox (1 Cor. 9:9) and of Jesus’ silencing a demon (Mark 1:25) and a storm (Mark 4:39).  The Sadducees were verbally incapacitated by the Lord, rendered utterly speechless, just like the man who was rebuked by the king for coming to the wedding feast without proper clothes (Matt. 22:12).”

 

            One would think that the results of the first two questions given to Jesus that could not be answered by the friends of the Pharisees that they would not want to ask Him another question, but they decided to have another try themselves at entrapping Him, this time directly by one of their own number rather than through their less capable disciples.  Now if they thought the others were less capable then they should not have used them earlier to ask questions.  We will see that they are not successful themselves as their lawyer will not only agree with Jesus but Jesus will tell him that he is not far from the kingdom of God.

 

            The feelings of the Pharisees were far outweighed, and I suppose that pride has a great deal to do with this and so they would try again, and so they gathered themselves together clandestinely somewhere in the Temple to plan their next strategy.  In do so, they unintentionally and unknowingly fulfilled prophecy by plotting together “against the Lord, and against His Christ” (Acts 4:26-28; Ps. 2:2) Out of that conclave came the third and final question to test Jesus.

 

            We see that their choice as seen in this section is a “lawyer,” but in Mark 12:28 he is called as scribe, as Matthew wanted to indicate his unusual expertise in the Mosaic law and perhaps also his renown in adjudicating religious and social disputes.  I have to believe that there is no difference in what this person was called as far as someone trying to make a big deal about this.

            “The lawyer, however, also seems to have been a cut above his fellow religious leaders in honesty and humility.  Like that of a few of the other scribes, his acknowledgment that Jesus had answered the Sadducees wisely seems to have been genuine (Mark 12:28; cf. Luke 20:39).  Obviously the man was not totally straightforward, because he allowed himself to be used in testing Jesus in order to discredit Him.  But apparently his duplicity was mixed with a measure of sincere concern for what Jesus would say in response to the test question.”   (MacArthur’s commentary)

 

9/2/2023 10:22 AM

No comments:

Post a Comment