Thursday, January 14, 2016

PT-1 The Inquiry (John 3:1-3)



SPIRITUAL DIARY FOR 1/14/2016 8:51 AM
My Worship Time                                                                                          Focus:  The Inquiry
Bible Reading & Meditation                                                         Reference:  John 3:1-3
Message of the verses:  “1 Now there was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews; 2  this man came to Jesus by night and said to Him, "Rabbi, we know that You have come from God as a teacher; for no one can do these signs that You do unless God is with him." 3 Jesus answered and said to him, ‘Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.’”
Now we have already mentioned that this story of Nicodemus meeting Jesus should be tied in with verses 23-25 of chapter two as Nicodemus surely saw some of the signs (miracles) that Jesus did during the time of the Passover celebration that Jesus and His disciples attended which marks the first Passover that Jesus went to after beginning His actual ministry as seen in chapter one and two.  Now we also looked at the truth of the statement “24  But Jesus, on His part, was not entrusting Himself to them, for He knew all men, 25  and because He did not need anyone to testify concerning man, for He Himself knew what was in man” (John 2:24-25). So when we tie this into this meeting we know that Jesus knows the hearts of all men including Nicodemus, as according to John MacArthur “Nicodemus himself was one of those superficial believers whose heard He read like an open book.  Instead of affirming his profession, the Lord refused to accept Nicodemus’s faith, which was solely based on the signs he had witnessed (v. 2). Jesus pointed him to the life-transforming nature of true saving faith.”
Now we have mentioned the word Pharisees, which Nicodemus was a part of but I want to take the time to quote from John MacArthur more about Pharisees.  He writes “Nicodemus was a member of the elite religious party the Pharisees.  Their name probably derives from a Hebrew verb meaning ‘to separate’; they were the ‘separated ones’ in the sense of being zealous for the Mosaic law (and their own oral traditions, which the added to it [cf. Matt. 15:2-6; Mark 7:8-1 3]), who opposed the Hellenizing of Jewish culture under the wicked Seleucid king Antiopus Epiphanies.  Unlike their archrivals the Sadducees, who tended to be wealthy priests or Levites, the Pharisees generally came from the middle class.  Therefore, though few in number (there were about 6,000 at the time of Herod the Great, according to the first century Jewish historical Josephus), they had great influence with the common people (though, ironically, the Pharisees often viewed some with contempt [cf. 7:49]).  Despite being the minority party, their popularity with the people gave them significant influence in the Sanhedrin (cf. Acts 5:34-40).
“With the disappearance of the Sadducees in AD 70 (after the temple was destroyed) and the Zealots in AD 135 (after Bar Kochba revolt was crushed), the Pharisees became the dominant force in Judaism.  In fact, by the end of the second century AD, with the completion of the Mishnah (the written compilation of the oral law, rituals, and traditions), the Pharisee’s teaching became virtually synonymous with Judaism.
   “Ironically, it was their very zeal for the law that caused the Pharisees to become ritualized and external.  Having unchanged hearts, they would only replace true religion with mere behavior modification and ritual.  In response to their pseudo-spirituality, Jesus scathingly pointed out:  ‘Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!  For you tithe mint and dill and cumin, and have neglected the weightier provisions of the law; justice and mercy and faithfulness; but these are the things you should have done without neglecting the others’ (Matt. 23:23; cf. 6:1-5; 9:14; 12:2; Luke 11:38-39).”  I think this quote will give us a better idea of who the Pharisees were and as we look through the New Testament we will find that Nicodemus and Saul of Tarsus who latter is known as the apostle Paul are the only two Pharisees who came to faith in Jesus Christ.  And as we look at verse ten we find out that Nicodemus was no run-of-the-mill Pharisee for the definite article was used by Jesus to describe him:  "Are you the teacher of Israel and do not understand these things?”  Now we will get to talk more about this verse when we get here, but notice that Jesus calls Nicodemus “the teacher of Israel” while He is talking to him.  Nicodemus was also a member of the Sanhedrin as seen in John 7:50 “Nicodemus (he who came to Him before, being one of them) said to them.”  
Now John MacArthur writes the following on the Sanhedrin:  “Jewish tradition traced the origin of the Sanhedrin to the seventy elders who assisted Moses (Num. 11:16-17).  Ezra, also according to tradition, reorganized that body after the exile (cf. Ezra 5:5, 9; 6:7-8, 14; 10:8).  However, the Sanhedrin of the New Testament times probably originated during the period of Persian or Greek rule.  It consisted of seventy-one members, presided over by the reigning high priest.  It included men from the influential priestly families, elders (family and tribal heads), scribes (experts in the law), and any former high priests who were still alive.  Under the Romans, the Sanhedrin exercised wide-ranging powers in civil, criminal, and religious matters (though the Romans withheld the power of capital punishment [18:31]).  It had the authority both to make arrests (Matt. 26:47; Acts 4:1-3; 5:17-18) and to conduct trials (Matt. 26:57ff.; Acts 5:27 ff.).  Although its influence extended even to Jews of the Diaspora (Acts 9:1-2; 22:5; 26:12), the Sanhedrin’s direct authority seems to have been limited to Judea (it apparently wielded no power over Jesus while He was in Galilee; cf. John 7:1).  After the failure of the Jewish revolt (ad 66-70), the Sanhedrin was abolished and replaced by the Beth Din (Court of Judgment).  Unlike the Sanhedrin, however, the Beth Din was composed solely of scribes (lawyers), and its decisions were exclusively limited to religious matters.”
I realize that all of the is kind of technical things about who Nicodemus was and the fact that he was a member of the Sanhedrin and also a Pharisee, but I believe that this is important for us to understand who he was and because of his position we can be sure that it took a lot of courage for him to come to Jesus and perhaps that is one of the reasons why he came to Him at night, or maybe it was because that was the best time to have an audience with Him.  We will talk more about this in our next SD on these verses.
Spiritual meaning for my life today:  As I look at Nicodemus in this chapter and in the proceeding chapters I do admire his courage.
My Steps of Faith for Today:  Be courageous.
Answer to yesterday’s Bible question:  “Elijah” (1 Kings 17:1).
Today’s Bible question:  “Which book records an ax head floating in the water?”
Answer in our next SD.
1/14/2016 9:56 AM  

No comments:

Post a Comment