Thursday, April 16, 2026

PT-4 “The Incident At Twelve” (Luke 2:41-51)

 

EVENING SPIRITUAL DIARY FOR 4/16/2026 6:10 PM

My Worship Time                                                             Focus:  PT-4 “The Incident At Twelve”

Bible Reading & Meditation                                                                Reference:  Luke 2:41-51

            Message of the verses:  41 His parents went to Jerusalem every year at the Feast of the Passover. 42 And when He was twelve years old, they went up there according to the custom of the feast; 43 and as they were returning, after spending the full number of days required, the boy Jesus stayed behind in Jerusalem, but His parents were unaware of it44 Instead, they thought that He was somewhere in the caravan, and they went a day’s journey; and then they began looking for Him among their relatives and acquaintances. 45 And when they did not find Him, they returned to Jerusalem, looking for Him. 46 Then, after three days they found Him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the teachers, both listening to them and asking them questions. 47 And all who heard Him were amazed at His understanding and His answers. 48 When Joseph and Mary saw Him, they were bewildered; and His mother said to Him, “Son, why have You treated us this way? Behold, Your father and I have been anxiously looking for You!” 49 And He said to them, “Why is it that you were looking for Me? Did you not know that I had to be in My Father’s house?” 50 And yet they on their part did not understand the statement which He had [made to them. 51 And He went down with them and came to Nazareth, and He continued to be subject to them; and His mother treasured all these things in her heart.”

            I would like to be able to finish this section in this evenings Spiritual Diary, and then in tomorrow mornings SD do the last section in this second chapter of Luke.  I believe that this section that we have been looking at is one of the great sections found in the Gospels.  I will begin with quoting more of what MacArthur wrote in this section, along with giving comments that I have too.

            “It was Jesus’ claim to be the Son of God above all else that infuriated His Jewish opponents and led to His execution.  In John 5:17, Jesus defended His healing of a crippled man on the Sabbath by saying, ‘My Father is working until now, and I Myself am working.’’ The Jewish authorities were outraged, and as John noted in verse 18: ‘For this reason therefore the Jews were seeking all the more to kill Him, because He not only was breaking the Sabbath, but also was calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God.’  In John 10:36, they accused Him of blasphemy for calling Himself the Son of God.’   At Christ’s mock trial it was His affirmation that He was the Son of God that gave the Sanhedrin the excuse to declare Him guilty of blasphemy and thus deserving of death (Matt. 26:63-66).  After Pilate pronounced Jesus innocent ‘the Jews answered him, ‘We have a law, and by that law He ought to die because He made Himself out to be the Son of God’ (John 19:7).  And when Jesus was on the cross, they mocked His claim to be the Son of God (Matt. 27:40, 43).

            “The reason Jesus’ claim to be the Son of God infuriated the Jewish leaders is that such a claim, as they understood perfectly, was a claim to deity, to full equality with God.  The title Son of God describes Jesus as the second person of the Trinity, God incarnate.  The full, rich meaning the title Son of God is not evident from the English concept of sonship.  In Jewish culture ‘son’ denoted more than just a male offspring.  A young underage child was considered a boy; only when that boy had become an adult was  he a son in the fullest sense.  It was then that he became equal to his father under the law and in terms of adult responsibility, and received the privileges his father had reserved for him.  ‘Son,’ in this more technical sense, came to mean ‘equal to’ or ‘one with.’

            “There are a number of examples in Scripture where ‘son’ identifies a person’s nature.  Barnabas’s name means ‘son of encouragement.  Jesus called James and John ‘Sons of thunder’ (Mark 3:17), identifying them with that term because of their bombastic personalities.  Similarly, He described some people as ‘son[s] of hell’ Matt. 23:15 because they had the characteristics of those who are hell bound.  In much the same way, both Judas (John 17:12) and the Antichrist (2 Thess. 2:3) are called sons of perdition or destruction (the same Greek word is used to describe both individuals), identifying them with their eternal destiny.  Ephesians 2:2 calls unbelievers ‘sons of disobedience,’ while Matthew 13:38 describes them as ‘sons of the evil one’ (cf. John 8:44).  Luke 16:8 and John 12:36 call believers ‘sons of light;’ and Luke 20:36 calls them ‘sons of the resurrection.’’

            “Son’ in the above examples does not refer to origin, but to nature.  The term is used to refer to Jesus Christ to establish His being of the same essence and nature, with the same rights and privileges, as God Himself.  As noted above, the Jewish leaders understood perfectly that by claiming to be the Son of God, Jesus was claiming deity and full equality with the Father.

            “Some might argue that the terms ‘only begotten’ (monogenes; John 1:14, 18, 3:16, 18; 1 John 4:9) and ‘firstborn’ (Prototokos; Rom. 8:29; Col. 1:15, 18; Heb. 1:6; Rev. 1:5) indicate that Jesus came into existence, and thus was not God from all eternity.  But neither of those terms refer to origin.  Monogenes means ‘one of a kind,’ and distinguishes Jesus as the unique Son of God from believers, who are sons of God in a different sense (cf. 1 John 3:2).” 

(1 John 3:2)

“2  Beloved, we are God’s children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared; but we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is.”

“The Bible calls Isaac Abraham’s monogenes (Heb. 11:17), even though Isaac was neither Abraham’s oldest son nor his only son, because he alone was the son of the covenant (Gen. 21:12; cf. Rom. 9:7).  Prototokos, when used of Christ , does not refer to chronology, but to preeminence.  Both Colossians 1:18 and Revelation 1:5 call Jesus the ‘firstborn from the dead,’ because of all who will ever be resurrected, He is the preeminent one.  In Exodus 4:22, God refers to Israel as His firstborn; though Israel was not the first nation to come into existence chronologically, she was the first among the nations in preeminence.

            “To argue that the terms ‘firstborn’ and ‘only begotten’ mean that Jesus was a created being is contradictory.  Jesus could not be both the ‘only begotten’ and the ‘first begotten.’  Nor could He be the creator of the universe (Col. 1:16) if He Himself were a created being.

            “Joseph and Mary did not fully understand the profound statement which Jesus had made to them.  They understood that He was the Messiah, the Son of David, conceived in a virgin’s womb by the power of the Holy Spirit.  But the full meaning of His divine sonship eluded them.  This would not be the last time that His followers would fail to grasp what Jesus was saying (cf. Luke 9:44-45; 18:34; John 10:6; 12:16).

            “But the time for Jesus to leave His parents’ authority had not yet arrived, so He went down with them and came to Nazareth, and He continued in subjection to them.  His relationship with His heavenly Father did not yet abrogate His responsibility to obey His earthly parents.  His obedience to the fifth commandment was an essential part of Jesus’ perfect obedience to the law of God.

            “Here was the first fulfillment of Simeon’s warning to Mary in 2:35, as she treasured all these things in her heart.  She had much to think about as she pondered Jesus’ amazing reply.  Mary had to realize that her Son was her Savior, and she would have to exchange her parental authority over Him for His divine authority over her.  The sword would pierce her heart again later in her last appearance in Luke’s gospel (8:19-21), when Jesus distanced Himself from His human relationship with her and His siblings (cf. 11:27-28).  Ultimately, the sword would pierce Mary’s heart as she watched her Son suffer and die on the cross.”

            This section of Luke’s gospel has brought much meaning to me as I studied it by not only reading from MacArthur’s commentary but also listening to around three hours of his sermons on this section.  We have one shorter section to look at, and then move onto the third chapter of Luke’s gospel and Lord willing will do it in tomorrow morning’s SD.

4/16/2026 6:55 PM

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment